Compare HCL AppScan vs. Veracode
HCL AppScan is ranked 6th in Application Security with 13 reviews while Veracode is ranked 1st in Application Security with 43 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 8.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes "The ease of use is key, the developers can actually use it and get results from dynamic testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Enables us to automatically submit each new build for scanning and get results directly into our JIRA". HCL AppScan is most compared with Veracode, SonarQube and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx. See our HCL AppScan vs. Veracode report.
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: September 2019. 371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected. The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well. It provides a better integration for our ecosystem. You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI. We leverage it as a quality check against code. We are now deploying less defects to production. Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production. It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end. | We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes. I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code. The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs. We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle. One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important. It has an easy-to-use interface. Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools. It has almost completely eliminated the presence of SQLi vulnerabilities. |
Cons | |
IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications. There is not a central management for static and dynamic. Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products. I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources. I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers. IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use. There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good. | One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications. Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them. I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages. Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis. We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time. Veracode scans provide a higher number of false positives. The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report. It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost. | They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey. They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works. Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription. No issues, the pricing seems reasonable. It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool. I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms. Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good. I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs. 371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 14,138 Comparisons 9,708 Reviews 12 Average Words per Review 401 Avg. Rating 8.0 | Views 47,953 Comparisons 25,711 Reviews 43 Average Words per Review 618 Avg. Rating 8.2 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. | Compared 48% of the time. Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan | |
Learn | |
| HCL | Veracode |
Overview | |
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations. | Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis. |
Offer | |
Learn more about HCL AppScan | Learn More About Veracode Stay Up-To-Date on Application Security |
Sample Customers | |
| Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT | State of Missouri, Rekner |
Top Industries | |
Insurance Company25% Government25% Manufacturing Company13% Financial Services Firm13% Software R&D Company36% Government14% Comms Service Provider9% Financial Services Firm7% | Financial Services Firm35% Insurance Company17% Consumer Goods9% Government4% Software R&D Company36% Comms Service Provider12% Financial Services Firm9% Retailer5% |
Company Size | |
Small Business10% Midsize Enterprise15% Large Enterprise75% Small Business13% Midsize Enterprise2% Large Enterprise85% | Small Business22% Midsize Enterprise27% Large Enterprise51% Small Business12% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise76% |
Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also HCL AppScan Reviews, Veracode Reviews, and our list of Best Application Security Companies.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.