Compare HCL AppScan vs. WebInspect

HCL AppScan is ranked 6th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 12 reviews while WebInspect is ranked 17th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 8.0, while WebInspect is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes "The ease of use is key, the developers can actually use it and get results from dynamic testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebInspect writes "Great centralized dashboard but is a bit overpriced". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, whereas WebInspect is most compared with HCL AppScan, PortSwigger Burp and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand. See our HCL AppScan vs. WebInspect report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCL AppScan Logo
14,861 views|10,206 comparisons
WebInspect Logo
5,597 views|4,138 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. WebInspect and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected.The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well.It provides a better integration for our ecosystem.You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.We leverage it as a quality check against code.We are now deploying less defects to production.Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production.It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end.

Read more »

It is scalable and very easy to use.It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning.I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level.Technical support has been good.

Read more »

Cons
IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications.There is not a central management for static and dynamic.Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products.I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers.​IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use​.There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. ​It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.

Read more »

The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex.The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective.I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities.The initial setup was complex.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
14,861
Comparisons
10,206
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
418
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
5,597
Comparisons
4,138
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
354
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScanMicro Focus WebInspect, Fortify WebInspect
Learn
HCL
Micro Focus
Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Most enterprises rely heavily on the Web to conduct their normal operations, whether providing services, a mechanism for retail sales, or a host of other functions. Yet, most still struggle with efficiently managing their application security risks. For one thing, they need solutions of scale that can be used to manage thousands of active sites and assessments while also tracking discovered vulnerabilities, retesting procedures, and more. They need to perform repeated security tests to address compliance with regulations, legislation, and internal security policies and also see how their risk posture has changed over time. The enterprises have to protect their data, brand, and bottom line from the harsh impacts of what successful vulnerability exploitation could bring. Micro Focus WebInspect Enterprise enables organizations to solve these security problems quickly, efficiently, and intelligently.
Offer
Learn more about HCL AppScan
Learn more about WebInspect
Sample Customers
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS ITAaron's
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company25%
Government25%
Transportation Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Government12%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company49%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government12%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. WebInspect and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.