• Home
  • HCL OneTest vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

HCL OneTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL OneTest and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use HCL OneTest?
Srprogmagr567
Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool
Ranking
30th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
608
Comparisons
250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
37th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
OneTest
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
HCLTech
OpenText
Overview

HCL OneTest provides software testing tools to support a DevOps approach: API testing, functional testing, UI testing, performance testing and service virtualization. It helps you automate and run tests earlier and more frequently to discover errors sooner — when they are less costly to fix. HCL also provides a bundled offering under a new consumption model that changes the way you can use and deploy DevOps software. The new offering helps simplify your planning for adoption and growth of critical DevOps products.

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Migros Bank AG
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company16%
Government11%
Educational Organization9%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HCL OneTest is ranked 30th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. HCL OneTest is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". HCL OneTest is most compared with IBM Rational Functional Tester, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, IBM Rational Test Workbench and Apache JMeter, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.