Compare HeadSpin vs. Micro Focus Business Process Testing

HeadSpin is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus Business Process Testing is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. HeadSpin is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Business Process Testing is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HeadSpin writes "The first connected intelligence platform that is easy to use for testing mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Business Process Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile, BrowserStack and Sauce Labs, whereas Micro Focus Business Process Testing is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One and Automation Anywhere (AA).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Business Process Testing? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform.

Read more »

The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively.

Read more »

Cons
Support and pricing could be improved.

Read more »

The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
Views
789
Comparisons
616
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
663
Avg. Rating
8.0
26th
Views
314
Comparisons
198
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
413
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn
HeadSpin
Micro Focus
Overview

HeadSpin is the world’s first Connected Intelligence Platform™ that provides Web, Mobile, IoT, and 5G solutions to unify testing, monitoring, and analytics across applications, devices, and networks. HeadSpin empowers development, QA, operations, and network teams to optimize connected experiences and ensure digital business success.

Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about Micro Focus Business Process Testing
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, TelstraMigros Bank AG
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company64%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.