Compare HeadSpin vs. Ranorex Studio

HeadSpin is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Ranorex Studio is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. HeadSpin is rated 8.0, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HeadSpin writes "The first connected intelligence platform that is easy to use for testing mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile, BrowserStack and Sauce Labs, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Micro Focus UFT One.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HeadSpin Logo
789 views|616 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
12,489 views|9,287 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform.

Read more »

This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

Cons
Support and pricing could be improved.

Read more »

For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.

Read more »

There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
Views
789
Comparisons
616
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
663
Avg. Rating
8.0
11th
Views
12,489
Comparisons
9,287
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
545
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Learn
HeadSpin
Ranorex
Overview

HeadSpin is the world’s first Connected Intelligence Platform™ that provides Web, Mobile, IoT, and 5G solutions to unify testing, monitoring, and analytics across applications, devices, and networks. HeadSpin empowers development, QA, operations, and network teams to optimize connected experiences and ensure digital business success.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, TelstraSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company64%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company13%
Maritime Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.