Compare HeadSpin vs. Ranorex Studio

HeadSpin is ranked 35th in Functional Testing Tools while Ranorex Studio is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. HeadSpin is rated 0, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile, Experitest SeeTest and Kobiton Mobile Device Testing, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and UFT (QTP).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HeadSpin Logo
343 views|249 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
13,210 views|9,509 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use HeadSpin? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
35th
Views
343
Comparisons
249
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
10th
Views
13,210
Comparisons
9,509
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 62% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
HeadSpin
Ranorex
Overview

HeadSpin is the complete solution for all your mobile customer experience and performance needs. Through its Mobile Performance Platform (MPP), HeadSpin provides mobile application developers, game developers, carrier networks and device OEMs with detailed visibility into customer experience and performance issues from client to server. The MPP consists of more than 22,000 SIM-enabled devices in more than 150 locations and enables businesses to efficiently test, optimize and monitor for user experience and performance under real-world conditions around the world. HeadSpin's customers serve approximately 3 billion of the world's mobile users.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, TelstraSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Manufacturing Company13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email