Compare HeadSpin vs. SmartBear TestComplete

HeadSpin is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews. HeadSpin is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HeadSpin writes "The first connected intelligence platform that is easy to use for testing mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Works perfectly with the CUTE application and great for Windows OS, but not other operating systems". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile, BrowserStack and Sauce Labs, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and Katalon Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HeadSpin Logo
789 views|616 comparisons
SmartBear TestComplete Logo
20,013 views|13,250 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform.

Read more »

Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.

Read more »

Cons
Support and pricing could be improved.

Read more »

The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.

Read more »

The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
Views
789
Comparisons
616
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
663
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
Views
20,013
Comparisons
13,250
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
409
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
HeadSpin
SmartBear
Overview

HeadSpin is the world’s first Connected Intelligence Platform™ that provides Web, Mobile, IoT, and 5G solutions to unify testing, monitoring, and analytics across applications, devices, and networks. HeadSpin empowers development, QA, operations, and network teams to optimize connected experiences and ensure digital business success.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, TelstraCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company64%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company22%
Financial Services Firm11%
Retailer11%
Comms Service Provider11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.