Compare HeadSpin vs. UFT (QTP)

HeadSpin is ranked 39th in Functional Testing Tools while UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews. HeadSpin is rated 0, while UFT (QTP) is rated 0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile and Experitest SeeTest, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HeadSpin Logo
186 views|138 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
56,252 views|16,010 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use HeadSpin? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2019.
353,754 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
353,754 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
39th
Views
186
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
1st
Views
56,252
Comparisons
16,010
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
850
Avg. Rating
8.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 85% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
HeadSpin
Micro Focus
Overview

HeadSpin is the complete solution for all your mobile customer experience and performance needs. Through its Mobile Performance Platform (MPP), HeadSpin provides mobile application developers, game developers, carrier networks and device OEMs with detailed visibility into customer experience and performance issues from client to server. The MPP consists of more than 22,000 SIM-enabled devices in more than 150 locations and enables businesses to efficiently test, optimize and monitor for user experience and performance under real-world conditions around the world. HeadSpin's customers serve approximately 3 billion of the world's mobile users.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Manufacturing Company17%
Software R&D Company11%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2019.
353,754 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email