Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs OpenText Service Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ivanti Logo
1,646 views|621 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
1,367 views|924 comparisons
79% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and OpenText Service Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Help Desk Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs. OpenText Service Manager Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This is an excellent alternative to ServiceNow for smaller companies.""HEAT Service Management is good for asset and service desk management. It is the focal point for this solution.""I like Cloud Neurons. Since it's a cloud version, it's much easier to enhance productivity because it collects all the information automatically.""It is easy to set up.""The solution's technical support is excellent. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.""Overall, the platform, in its abilities, is really powerful, especially now with AI as a part of hyper-automation.""The main feature for us is incident management, as it assists me in knowing my assignments, because we have group assignments. When we go to the group assignment they can assign it to me there.""The solution's installation depends on its customization. It is easy."

More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM Pros →

"The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation. That would bring efficiency as well the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs. Productivity and collaborative capabilities are some of the key benefits.""The solution is simple to set up.""Technical support is pretty good.""It's pretty well-structured in modules.""It's mostly so reliable and has a lot of functionality. We're using a lot of HPE tools and we can do a lot with it. So, its functionality is the most valuable feature.""Service Manager gives us a single system where everything is centralized in one base.""Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated.""Sometimes, customization is simple. The version we are using now has a nice interface."

More OpenText Service Manager Pros →

Cons
"Perhaps one area that could see enhancement is at the hardware level, particularly regarding endpoint control.""Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is not a user-friendly tool when compared to ServiceNow.""Configuration requirements are extensive, even in basic Service Desk processes.""Support needs improvement in terms of responsiveness and timeliness.""The user interface must be made simpler and more effective.""There is room for improvement in terms of response time. The support team takes a long time to respond.""Sometimes I can't get the reports that I want until I go to the manager. They need to put more into the new reports. The standard reports are great, but there do not communicate as much.""We'd like more integration with solutions like SolarWinds."

More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM Cons →

"There should be some front desk provided or some options to let our users serve themselves, because we have about 5000 servers and 400 applications.""Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more.""Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required.""I don't see anything lacking.""It needs to be easier to use for the end users because one problem we had was that we are handling different kinds of cases.""I think the best recommendation to Micro Focus would be to increase awareness and the marketing for this product.""The user interface is very clunky. It's only now beginning to be a web-based interface, but for now it's still very clunky.""The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement."

More OpenText Service Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you want to add more users who can handle support there will be additional fees. What we call our extensions, we need to pay more for. They tell us that we need to acquire more licenses or something like that. I think it's very expensive, because in terms the pula, our local currency, it's about 20,000 per license for each user. It is an annual fee."
  • "I came to know from my team members that my company used to operate ServiceNow but shifted to Ivanti Neurons for ITSM due to its low licensing prices."
  • "The product is affordable for small businesses."
  • "The price is on the higher side. The support is included in the standard licensing fees."
  • More Ivanti Neurons for ITSM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."
  • "Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."
  • "The license is not cheap."
  • "I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."
  • "HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."
  • More OpenText Service Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like Cloud Neurons. Since it's a cloud version, it's much easier to enhance productivity because it collects all the information automatically.
    Top Answer:The price is on the higher side. The support is included in the standard licensing fees.
    Top Answer:For our region, there is room for improvement in price. So, maybe if Ivanti can bundle all the features together. Like, have one console instead of separate ones for different features. The customer… more »
    Top Answer:The product's technical support services need improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the product for infrastructure, profile, and incident management.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    1,646
    Comparisons
    621
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    565
    Rating
    8.3
    17th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    1,367
    Comparisons
    924
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HEAT Service Management
    Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
    Learn More
    Ivanti
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Automate workflows, eliminating costly manual processes, while making your business more efficient, compliant and secure. Whether you’re looking for an IT helpdesk/support ticket solution or need to perform more advanced ITIL service management processes, Ivanti Neurons for ITSM can easily scale and adapt to meet your specific business needs.

    Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

    Sample Customers
    AFS Group, Auckland Airport, Baylor University, County of Maui, Dis-Chem Pharmacies, Elia, Essentia Health, Government Research Laboratory, Groupe Webhelp, HSBC Africa, Midwestern University
    resultspositive, Globicon
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Retailer29%
    Educational Organization14%
    Government14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government19%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs. OpenText Service Manager
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs. OpenText Service Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is ranked 13th in Help Desk Software with 14 reviews while OpenText Service Manager is ranked 17th in Help Desk Software with 48 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is rated 8.2, while OpenText Service Manager is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for ITSM writes "The solution comes with a host of features for hyper-automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager writes "A solution that works out of the box. The solution's real strength is its ability to change for your organization's infrastructure". Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM, Cherwell Service Management and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, whereas OpenText Service Manager is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) and BMC Helix ITSM. See our Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs. OpenText Service Manager report.

    See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.