Compare Helix ALM vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager

Helix ALM is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools while IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 0, while IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and TFS, whereas IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and TestRail by Gurock.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
1,339
Comparisons
1,024
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
Views
1,603
Comparisons
955
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
TestTrackRational Quality Manager
Learn
Perforce
IBM
Overview

TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle. [1] This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code. [2] It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language. [3] TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project [4] providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts [5] and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects. [6] TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.

IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.
Offer
Learn more about Helix ALM
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Sample Customers
Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForceEhrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, Itaƒ BBA, Barr
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company47%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government12%
Healthcare Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.