Compare Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements
Use Helix ALM? Share your opinion.
 | Leadevteam67 Lead of Development Team at a manufacturing company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
1,093
Comparisons
886
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,862
Comparisons
2,326
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
472
Rating
6.0
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
TestTrack
TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle. [1] This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code. [2] It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language. [3] TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project [4] providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts [5] and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects. [6] TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.
Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.
Learn more about Helix ALM
Learn more about Polarion Requirements
Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce
NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation
Computer Software Company19%
Healthcare Company18%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company9%
Manufacturing Company27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Computer Software Company19%
Government4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Broadcom and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Helix ALM is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management while Polarion Requirements is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 0.0, while Polarion Requirements is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Well-structured, but the import feature and the dashboards need to be improved". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Jama Connect, IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Jama Connect and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.