Compare Helix ALM vs. PractiTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Helix ALM Logo
984 views|816 comparisons
PractiTest Logo
942 views|714 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."

More Helix ALM Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros »

Cons
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."

More Helix ALM Cons »

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration.
Top Answer: The product requires a clear understanding of what you want to do because it's a make environment. So it's like handing an artist a blank sheet with any color in any pallet or any paintbrush you want… more »
Top Answer: It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge. There're other platforms that do… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven.
Top Answer: Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive. There were no additional fees, everything was included in the license and the online support was great.
Top Answer: It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for… more »
Ranking
15th
Views
984
Comparisons
816
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
550
Rating
8.0
12th
Views
942
Comparisons
714
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
TestTrack
Learn More
Overview

TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle. [1] This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code. [2] It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language. [3] TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project [4] providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts [5] and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects. [6] TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Offer
Learn more about Helix ALM
Learn more about PractiTest
Sample Customers
Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider17%
Healthcare Company15%
Media Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Helix ALM is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Helix ALM is rated 8.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helps you measure, automate, and visualize your processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tricentis qTest, Zephyr Enterprise and Jira.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.