We performed a comparison between Helix ALM and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility."
"The tool offers high stability."
"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
"Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool."
"I like its simplicity."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"There are many useful features in Selenium that I like, and of the new features I particularly enjoy the Selenium Grid. With this, we can run many test cases in one go, and in one suite we can extract multiple results."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"The accountability and the equivalent to using, acting, editing, working with Word, and also importing and exporting from Word needs improvement."
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."
"Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it."
"They should leverage the tools for supporting Windows apps."
"Selenium HQ doesn't support Windows-based applications, so we need to integrate with the third-party vendor. It would be great if Selenium could include Windows-based automation. You need to integrate it with a third-party tool if you want to upload any files. When we interact with a Windows application, we usually use Tosca."
"If they can integrate more recording features, like UFT, it would be helpful for automation, but it's not necessary. They can also add a few more reporting features for advanced reporting."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
"It would be awesome if there was a standalone implementation of Selenium for non-developer users."
Helix ALM is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 7 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 6.4, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Helix ALM is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Polarion Requirements and Tricentis qTest, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.