Compare Helix ALM vs. Silk Central

Helix ALM is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools while Silk Central is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Helix ALM is rated 0, while Silk Central is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Central writes "A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and TFS, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Helix ALM Logo
1,339 views|1,024 comparisons
Silk Central Logo
1,440 views|757 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Helix ALM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
1,339
Comparisons
1,024
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
13th
Views
1,440
Comparisons
757
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,007
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
TestTrackBorland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn
Perforce
Micro Focus
Overview

TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle. [1] This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code. [2] It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language. [3] TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project [4] providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts [5] and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects. [6] TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about Helix ALM
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForceAmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Software R&D Company29%
Insurance Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government12%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.