Heroku vs QuickBase comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Heroku Logo
4,273 views|3,175 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Quickbase Logo
2,949 views|1,450 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Heroku and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds.
To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Valuable for us was the fast deployment. This means the time to market is improved without pain for developers.""We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites.""It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things.""The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us.""It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good.""One of the best things about Heroku is that it is very easy and straightforward to deploy an application.""The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides.""Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

More Heroku Pros →

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product.""We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared.""Allows users have anytime/anywhere access.""It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect.""Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed).""It has superb ease of use and no code needed to create and build apps and databases.""The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency.""It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."

More QuickBase Pros →

Cons
"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely.""They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more.""I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances.""We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better.""We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do.""Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it.""Their support is good, but they can improve their response time.""We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

More Heroku Cons →

"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls.""The dashboard is not organized.""I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen.""Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. .""The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work.""Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system.""This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve.​""The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."

More QuickBase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is very good."
  • "The price of Heroku could be less expensive."
  • "There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "The tool is free."
  • More Heroku Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."
  • "We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."
  • "Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."
  • "You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
  • "It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."
  • "The product is cheap when compared to other products."
  • "The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."
  • "The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."
  • More QuickBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.
    Top Answer:I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to streamline mobile application deployment and management. By connecting our project's GitHub repository to Heroku, I enabled automatic deployments whenever changes were pushed to… more »
    Top Answer:It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect.
    Top Answer:The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. Simplifying the system's interface could make it less intimidating for some users who might find the current setup a bit overwhelming due… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    4,273
    Comparisons
    3,175
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    307
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,949
    Comparisons
    1,450
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure logo
    Compared 35% of the time.
    Google Cloud logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Google App Engine logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    OpenShift logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Pivotal Cloud Foundry logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 33% of the time.
    Oracle Fusion Service logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Sales Creatio logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    OutSystems logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Mendix logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Quick Base, TSheets
    Learn More
    Overview

    Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

    Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

    Sample Customers
    Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.
    Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company43%
    Marketing Services Firm14%
    Sports Company14%
    Agriculture14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization13%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Construction Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization69%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Insurance Company3%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business81%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business51%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Buyer's Guide
    PaaS Clouds
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Heroku is ranked 13th in PaaS Clouds with 27 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews. Heroku is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Heroku writes "Useful for mobile and web applications, and helps with rapid development cycle ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Heroku is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Google App Engine, OpenShift and Pivotal Cloud Foundry, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Fusion Service, Sales Creatio, OutSystems and Mendix.

    We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.