Compare HGST ActiveScale vs. NetApp StorageGRID
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use HGST ActiveScale? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2021. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple. Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more » Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more » |
Ranking  | |
Views 366 Comparisons 305 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 4,572 Comparisons 2,888 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 728 Rating 8.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 60% of the time.  Compared 40% of the time. | Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Active Archive System, ActiveScale P100, ActiveScale X100 | Storage GRID |
Learn | |
| HGST | NetApp |
Overview | |
Big Data insights enable Fast Data applications. Your data can generate value when it’s aggregated, analyzed, and applied to business decisions. We live for long-term data preservation, and our ActiveScale object storage systems are changing the economics of data. The ActiveScale system architecture is designed for petabyte-scale datasets, facilitates storing data forever, and takes full advantage of our component-to-system vertical innovation. | Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. |
Offer | |
Learn more about HGST ActiveScale | Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID |
Sample Customers | |
| EPFL, Illumination Mac Guff | ASE, DARZ GmbH |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Computer Software Company28% Manufacturing Company18% Comms Service Provider14% Government9% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business25% Large Enterprise75% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HGST ActiveScale is ranked 15th in File and Object Storage while NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 5th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. HGST ActiveScale is rated 0.0, while NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". HGST ActiveScale is most compared with Scality RING8 and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, Cloudian HyperStore, MinIO and Scality RING8.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.