Compare HGST ActiveScale vs. Qumulo

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HGST ActiveScale Logo
402 views|337 comparisons
Qumulo Logo
5,733 views|4,879 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
402
Comparisons
337
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
13th
Views
5,733
Comparisons
4,879
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
412
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 64% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Active Archive System, ActiveScale P100, ActiveScale X100
Learn
HGST
Qumulo
Overview

Big Data insights enable Fast Data applications. Your data can generate value when it’s aggregated, analyzed, and applied to business decisions. We live for long-term data preservation, and our ActiveScale object storage systems are changing the economics of data. The ActiveScale system architecture is designed for petabyte-scale datasets, facilitates storing data forever, and takes full advantage of our component-to-system vertical innovation.

Real-time analytics are built directly into the Qumulo Scalable File System (QSFS) enabling instant answers about your data footprint, and how it’s being used, at scale.

Built on Linux, Qumulo Core runs on commodity hardware, on dedicated appliances, or in virtual machines providing the ultimate flexibility and cost advantages.

Qumulo Core is optimized for the widest range of workloads and file sizes including transactional and sequential access patterns and small and large files.

Offer
Learn more about HGST ActiveScale
Learn more about Qumulo
Sample Customers
EPFL, Illumination Mac GuffUniversity of Washington, Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Zoic Studios, Sinclair Oil, Blind Visual Propaganda, Sportvision, Telus Studios, Ant Farm, Densho, MSG Netowrks, Eight Solutions
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider7%
Retailer6%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HGST ActiveScale is ranked 15th in File and Object Storage while Qumulo is ranked 13th in File and Object Storage with 1 review. HGST ActiveScale is rated 0.0, while Qumulo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". HGST ActiveScale is most compared with Scality RING8 and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Scality RING8, SoftNAS and Red Hat Ceph Storage.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.