Compare Hillstone E-Series vs. Sophos UTM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA Firewall Logo
70,051 views|51,086 comparisons
Hillstone E-Series Logo
940 views|642 comparisons
Sophos UTM Logo
59,902 views|48,830 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hillstone E-Series vs. Sophos UTM and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is a comprehensive suite and complete package.""The integration and configuration were pretty straightforward.""The transparency of the single UI to ensure security. A product has to be simple so that an administrator can use it.""It provides security for our company and users.""Among the top features are integrated threat defence and the fact that each virtual appliance is separate so you get great granular control.""Its VPN and ASN features are very stable.""The setup was straightforward. I was happy with the configuration and deployment of the solution, as it was quick.""This solution has good security, and it's a good product. You can trust Cisco, and there's support as well, which is really good."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pros »

"Working with the Hillstone E-Series has, from a remote perspective, allowed me to give my clients a secure connectivity.""The initial setup was straightforward. It only took a few hours to deploy."

More Hillstone E-Series Pros »

"Sophos has a single pane of glass which allows me to manage all my VPCs from a single instance, managing all my firewall from one place.""It helped to connect our satellite offices to the main Amazon infrastructure in a circular way.""It has made our organization more secure, because we are using a VPN. We are not accessing services directly. It allows us to segregate some of the traffic for individuals which may be more of a developer role rather than an operational role needing access to developer resources, but not necessarily production operational resources.""It makes it a lot easier for us to maintain things. Prior to it, things were more difficult. This means less time on us. We can focus on other things. The recovery is more in man-hours for us than anything else.""It works well without any maintenance. So far, it has worked pretty well regardless of the traffic.""It meets our compliance needs in an elastic computer environment.""The implementation with the AWS environment was good.""It has helped by identifying threats within the company. If there are computers or servers that are compromised, then we are able to identify them right away in the system."

More Sophos UTM Pros »

Cons
"Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.""Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version.""The artificial intelligence and machine learning (behavioral based threat detection), which I can this will be coming out in another year, these are what we need now.""The initial setup was complex.""There are always vulnerabilities that come up and there was one in early 2018 but this was patched with software updates.""In terms of next-generation capabilities, Cisco is a little behind, and it is way behind the market leaders.""The phishing emails could be improved.""There may have been one or two incidences of malicious threats."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Cons »

"I am not sure if this solution offers active directory integration. Adding that feature will definitely be an advantage.""The solution doesn't have a web proxy built into the system like Sophos. This is something they should work to change."

More Hillstone E-Series Cons »

"I would like them to move from the Classic Load Balancer to the Network Load Balancer. This would make it easier to do certain things with Amazon. They are able to do some enhancements with Network Load Balancer that they are unable to do with Classic Load Balancer.""We had some problems with the configuration. They had provided a CloudFormation template, and we had to go several rounds to make it work.""They could definitely improve on the support, especially in other countries.""The documentation during the AWS integration was a little fuzzy on getting it to work with how the whole public exposure versus private exposure, then routing some of the traffic.""The product could be simplified and made more self-explanatory.""It is a little too CPU resource intensive, so we would like to see improvements there.""They could reduce the price.""The technical support only communicates via email. I would prefer to communicate directly with someone."

More Sophos UTM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.""It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.""Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.""With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.""We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.""Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.""Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.""The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"We originally purchased the solution through the AWS Marketplace. I started my proof of concept doing pay-as-you-go, then moved to a VAR for a 'Bring Your Own Licence' (BYOL) licensing model. The BYOL license still requires you to accept the terms of the AWS Marketplace to deploy.""Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace went smoothly. We did not have any issues and the pricing was decent.""Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace is pretty straightforward. Because were entirely on AWS and don't have anything anywhere else. It made the most sense for us as a one stop shop.""The pricing is pretty reasonable. I don't think that it is overly expensive.""The AWS Marketplace product should be a better fit, but it is a little pricier.""The pricing and licensing are both good and better than Sophos's competitors. This is why we went with the product.""Sometimes more is less, meaning if you want more than three features, take the FullGuard licence.""We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses."

More Sophos UTM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: In my opinion and as a result of years of experience: - Both are great firewalls with excellent performance and a… more »
Top Answer: My understanding is that UTM is the software; SG is the hardware. You can buy Sophos UTM running on SG hardware and then… more »
Top Answer: One other big difference is that pfSense is FreeBSD based while Sophos UTM is linux based. It is also worth having a… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAvAstaro
Learn
Cisco
Hillstone Networks
Sophos
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

Hillstone E-Series next generation firewalls provide visibility and control of web applications regardless of port, protocol, or evasive action. It can identify and prevent potential threats associated with high-risk applications while providing policy-based control over applications, users, and user-groups. Policies can be defined that guarantee bandwidth to mission-critical applications while restricting or blocking inappropriate or malicious applications. Hillstone E-Series firewalls incorporate comprehensive network security and advanced firewall features. They provide superior price performance, excellent energy efficiency, and a smaller size when compared to competing products.

The global network of highly skilled researchers and analysts, protecting businesses from known and emerging malware - viruses, rootkits and spyware.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about Hillstone E-Series
Learn more about Sophos UTM
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Bank of China Macao, Instituto Tecnológico Bolivariano, Ministry of Labor in San Salvador, FEDCOOne Housing Group
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company11%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company24%
Media Company5%
Government5%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company21%
Media Company7%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise40%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business61%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business60%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hillstone E-Series vs. Sophos UTM and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hillstone E-Series is ranked 28th in Firewalls with 2 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 22 reviews. Hillstone E-Series is rated 8.6, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Hillstone E-Series writes "Secure connectivity and active directory integration simplifies remote working". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "Has a solid state hard drive and can boot in less than sixty seconds". Hillstone E-Series is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, Cisco IOS SSL VPN, Meraki MX and OpenVPN Access Server, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, Untangle NG Firewall and Meraki MX. See our Hillstone E-Series vs. Sophos UTM report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.