• Home
  • Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System vs Microsoft ATA [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
DAVI TEIXEIRA
Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed
Anonymous User
Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats.""One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →

"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.""One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.""The stability of the solution is very good."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats.""The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →

"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area.""It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.""Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of the solution is good. It is less expensive than the other solutions in the market. There are not any additional features or hidden costs."

    • More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."

    • More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection Sy...
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection Sy...
    Top Answer:The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detect...
    Top Answer:We are using Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System to look for threats in our network, such as barriers and malicious software.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    22nd
    out of 43 in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    Views
    62
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    7.0
    Unranked
    In User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hillstone sBDS
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]
    Learn More
    Hillstone Networks
    Microsoft
    Overview

    The Hillstone Server Breach Detection System (sBDS) adopts multiple threat detection technologies that include both traditional signature-based technology as well as large-scale threat intelligent data modeling and user behavioral analytics modeling, which provides an ideal solution to detect unknown or 0-day threat attacks, to protect high-value, critical servers and their sensitive data from being leaked or stolen. Together with deep threat hunting analysis capabilities and visibility, Hillstone sBDS provides security admins the effective means to detect IOCs (Indicators of Compromise) events, restore the threat attack kill chain and provide extensive visibility into threat intelligence analysis and mitigations.

    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
    Sample Customers
    Norbert Wiener University, Regional Government of the Amazon
    Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 22nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.