HipChat [EOL] vs Quip comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
views| comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Quip Logo
384 views|343 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HipChat [EOL] and Quip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise Social Software
Views
384
Comparisons
343
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Quip
Video Not Available
Overview

HipChat is a service that provides companies with a chat and text-messaging platform that they can run internally. This keeps all correspondences private in general but public to the people who you choose to be a part of the conversation. Some of the more popular features of HipChat include a searchable history, which lets you browse through your chats to find relevant information, as well as image sharing capabilities (which is a simple, drag and drop process). HipChat supports a wide range of OS including Mac, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS,desktop, and more.

HipChat can be used for one-on-one conversations or it can be opened up for group chats to include all team members. Chat rooms are flexible enough to allow the free flow of ideas and external data so that the entire team or even department can collaborate on the same project without missing a beat. At the same time, HipChat allows individuals to pick and choose whom they communicate with and one does not need to send all communications to all team members all the time, but can pick and choose who receives what and when.

Quip is a team collaboration solution which combines document and spreadsheet creation and editing with chat and commenting capabilities, to allow teams to communicate about tasks and projects directly while working on them.
Sample Customers
Pinterest, Quora,Hewlett Packard, Hubspot, ParkWhiz, Artifakt, and others.
Fender, Twitch, Pinterest, Ultimate Software, New Relic, Facebook, Path, Larry Miller Companies, Kent Moore Cabinets, Taser, Zomato, Quora, Wealthfront, Benchmark, Greylock, Stripe, CNN, FiftyThree, Artivest, Trinity Valley School (edu), Delectable, Jack, NW stage, Average Joes Entertainment, Circa, Instacart, Mode Analytics, Clara, Assist, Remind, Airtable, Lean In, Famous, Al Jazeera,
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company15%
Outsourcing Company10%
Manufacturing Company8%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business73%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise52%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HipChat [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software while Quip is ranked 14th in Content Collaboration Platforms. HipChat [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Quip is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HipChat [EOL] writes "Some of the valuable features include video calling and screen sharing". On the other hand, HipChat [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Quip is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs and Slack.

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.