Compare Hiptest vs. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Hiptest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

More Hiptest Pros »

"The AI and functionality interface are useful.""It has a good response time.""From reporting to team management, everything is better now.""By using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.""Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needs""We can get an entire project into a single repository where we can view all the data in detail. This is where we keep all our test cases where everyone can reference them. This provides everyone access to the test cases and artifacts via the cloud. There is no need to contact anyone.""The best thing is that you can see your current status in real time... To see real-time updates, you just log in to ALM and you can see exactly what the progress is. You can also see if the plan for the day is being executed properly, and it's all tracked. From the management side, I find those features very valuable.""The test-case repository and linkage through to regression requirements will absolutely be a key component for us. We haven't got it yet, but when we've got an enterprise regression suite, that will be a key deliverable for them. We will be able to have all of the regression suite in one place, linked to the right requirements."

More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pros »

Cons
"The reporting needs to be improved."

More Hiptest Cons »

"Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution.""ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach.""We would like to have support for agile development.""The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.""The version of Micro Focus ALM that we use only works through Internet Explorer (IE). We have to communicate to everyone that they can only use IE with the solution. This is a big limitation. We should be free to use any type of browser or operating system. We have customers and partners who are unable to log into the system and enter their defects because they work on a different operating system.""ALM only works on Internet Explorer. It doesn't work on any other browser. In my opinion, Internet Explorer is generally a bit slower. I would like to see it work on Chrome or on other browsers.""There's room for improvement on the reporting side of things and the scheduling, in general, is a bit clunky.""One drawback is that ALM only launches with the IE browser. It is not supporting the latest in Chrome... It should be launched for all of the latest browsers."

More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution.""We have divided our licenses between Micro Focus ALM and ALM Octane. It works for us.""Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.""Compared to the market, the price is high.""Pricing is managed by our headquarters. I am able to get from them for very cheap. The market price is horribly expensive.""It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective.""Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license.""The solution has the ability to handle a large number of projects and users in an enterprise environment with the correct license."

More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We can get an entire project into a single repository where we can view all the data in detail. This is where we keep all our test cases where everyone can reference them. This provides everyone… more »
Top Answer: Compared to the market, the price is high. We just renewed our licenses, which took time to do. I think we have 30 concurrent licenses. The world is changing to open source code and free applications… more »
Top Answer: It takes time because it has a 360 view of all the processes when talking about test case, design, and defects. There are so many things to track. Therefore, if I try to inject Micro Focus ALM into a… more »
Ranking
15th
Views
1,812
Comparisons
1,287
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
447
Avg. Rating
6.0
1st
Views
22,323
Comparisons
13,527
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
1,028
Avg. Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
Learn
Hiptest
Micro Focus
Overview

Hiptest is a continuous testing platform enabling Agile & DevOps teams to test their software continuously from idea to production. Hiptest also:

- Creates, executes and tracks tests

- Automates and integrates with your CI tool

- Supports Behavior Driven Development (seamless integration with Cucumber)

Happy testing!

Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. 

Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products.

Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow.

Offer
Learn more about Hiptest
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center
Sample Customers
Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, DeliverooSpecsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, Turkcell
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider14%
Healthcare Company10%
Insurance Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise81%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hiptest is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 24 reviews. Hiptest is rated 6.0, while Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Hiptest writes "Efficient re-usability of action words, but better integration with the JIRA storyboard is needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center writes "Makes it easy to go back and execute the same test every time with automation". Hiptest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Octane, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS and Zephyr Enterprise.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.