We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"Having the links maintained within the tool is a huge boon to reporting requirements, tests, and defects."
"The integration with UFT is nice."
"The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed."
"The AI and functionality interface are useful."
"Test Execution (Test Lab): This allows us to track our manual tests with date and time and enter actual results and screenshots."
"You can maintain your test cases and requirements. You can also log the defects in it and make the traceability metrics out of it. There are all sorts of things you can do in this. It is not that complex to use. In terms of user experience, it is very simple to adopt. It is a good product."
"Business process management is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"Integration with other HPE products."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"Certain applications within this solution are not really compatible with certain applications like ERP. The problem is when we're trying to use these applications or devices, the solution itself doesn't scale."
"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve its marketing. For example, Tricentis is much better at letting the market know about new solutions and updates. The migration of the tool could improve, but it can be difficult."
"The uploading of test scripts can get a little cumbersome and that is a very sensitive task. They could improve on that a lot. It's really important that this gets better as I'm loading close to a thousand test scripts per cycle."
"The session timeout time needs to be longer in my opinion."
"There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic."
"Micro Focus is an expensive tool."
"Cross project reporting is limited to similar database schemas"
"The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT."
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
CucumberStudio is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 197 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
