We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"I like that it integrates with the Jira solutions."
"This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too."
"ALM Quality Center is a reliable, consolidated product."
"It provides visibility on release status and readiness."
"You can do your development from start to finish: starting with the requirements, ending with defects, and testing in-between."
"The setup is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable user feature that we use right now is the camera."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is its support for many automation technologies."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades"
"There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic."
"The performance could be faster."
"We have had a poor experience with customer service and support."
"One drawback is that ALM only launches with the IE browser. It is not supporting the latest in Chrome... It should be launched for all of the latest browsers."
"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve its marketing. For example, Tricentis is much better at letting the market know about new solutions and updates. The migration of the tool could improve, but it can be difficult."
"Lacks sufficient plug-ins."
"Requirements management could be improved as the use is very limited. E.g., they have always stated that, "You can monitor and create requirements," but it has its limitations. That's why companies will choose another requirements management solution and import data from that source system into Quality Center. Micro Focus has also invested in an adapter between Dimensions RM and ALM via Micro Focus Connect. However, I see room for improvements in this rather outdated tool. I feel what Micro Focus did is say, "Our strategy is not to improve these parts within the tool itself, but search for supported integrations within our own tool set." This has not been helpful."
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
CucumberStudio is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 197 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
