Compare Hiptest vs. qTest

Hiptest is ranked 17th in Test Management Tools while qTest is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. Hiptest is rated 0, while qTest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of qTest writes "Provides a central point of reference for tracking bugs and failures, who owns the issue and its status". Hiptest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas qTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TFS and Micro Focus ALM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hiptest Logo
3,439 views|2,216 comparisons
qTest Logo
Read 10 qTest reviews.
5,318 views|3,069 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Hiptest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license.It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market.Our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year.The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
Views
3,439
Comparisons
2,216
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
Views
5,318
Comparisons
3,069
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
2,048
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
Hiptest
Tricentis
Overview

Hiptest is a continuous testing platform enabling Agile & DevOps teams to test their software continuously from idea to production. Hiptest also:

- Creates, executes and tracks tests

- Automates and integrates with your CI tool

- Supports Behavior Driven Development (seamless integration with Cucumber)

Happy testing!

QASymphony is a leading provider of enterprise test case management, test analytics and exploratory testing solutions for agile development and QA teams. Our solutions help companies create better software by improving speed, efficiency and collaboration during the testing process.
Offer
Learn more about Hiptest
Learn more about qTest
Sample Customers
Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, DeliverooAmazon, Salesforce, Barclays, Adobe, SecureWorks, Samsung, OfficeDepot, Zappos, Cisco, Visa, Verizon, FICO, Silverpop, Nordstrom
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Insurance Company15%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email