CucumberStudio vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
39 views|18 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
898 views|763 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.""The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

More CucumberStudio Pros →

"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages.""The debugging feature is valuable.""The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.""User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable.""Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development.""Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market.""The stability has always been very good.""The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pros →

Cons
"The reporting needs to be improved.""I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

More CucumberStudio Cons →

"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options.""Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine.""Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability.""The documentation is limited.""The price is reasonable, but it's not the best.""The tool crashes and has high memory consumption.""The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable.""The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
  • "I think that the pricing is quite good."
  • "The pricing is expensive."
  • "We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."
  • "There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
  • "Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."
  • "The tool is expensive in my region."
  • "We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."
  • More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.
    Top Answer:Presently, when I work with Selenium, I need CucumberStudio just to make my project readable to other people, and for reporting, I use Maven. I think it would be better if we could also do the… more »
    Top Answer:I recommend the solution as it's easy to use. I rate the solution seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
    Top Answer:Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution.
    Top Answer:The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution. There used to be references material that were incorporated in the solution, but most of it has moved to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    39
    Comparisons
    18
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    7.0
    7th
    Views
    898
    Comparisons
    763
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    278
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hiptest
    Learn More
    SmartBear
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

    Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo
    Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization10%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CucumberStudio is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.