Compare HPE BladeSystem vs. Hitachi BladeSymphony

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Hitachi BladeSymphony? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: October 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
103
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
6,106
Comparisons
4,612
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
443
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 80% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
BladeSymphonyHP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Hitachi
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
Offer
Learn more about Hitachi BladeSymphony
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbHEMIS Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government9%
Insurance Company7%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider26%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: October 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony is ranked 14th in Blade Servers while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 6 reviews. Hitachi BladeSymphony is rated 0.0, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Easy to set up and offers good scalability with a small footprint". Hitachi BladeSymphony is most compared with , whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Superdome X and Super Micro SuperBlade.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.