Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs Oracle Netra Modular System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and Oracle Netra Modular System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
22nd
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
34
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
Learn More
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Ovum
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Netra Modular System writes "It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence throughout the whole stack". Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.