Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs Oracle Sun 6000 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and Oracle Sun 6000 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
15th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
133
Comparisons
121
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
Sun 6000
Learn More
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

Oracle's Sun Blade 6000 chassis is designed to support a wide range of application environments by integrating Oracle's x86 and SPARC server modules with high capacity networking and storage modules. This extremely eco-efficient and flexible blade enclosure provides a solid foundation for the most demanding workloads. Controlled by a single system management interface, the balanced architecture of the Sun Blade 6000 chassis provides an open, standards-based infrastructure for virtualized business applications, IT infrastructure, middleware, workload consolidation and databases.

Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
dcVAST
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while Oracle Sun 6000 is ranked 15th in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Sun 6000 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Sun 6000 is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.