• Home
  • Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs. SGI Rackable Systems [EOL]

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
Rackable Systems
Learn More
Hitachi Vantara
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Video Not Available
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.