We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Hitachi Content Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users.""Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data.""The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users."

More Hitachi Content Platform Pros »

"It performs well and it is also very fast.""The most valuable features are the Metro clustering, and disaster recovery.""It's very easy-to-use.""The initial setup is pretty quick.""The onboarding and integrated monitoring tools are pretty good.""It uses the same platform for connectivity so integration is seamless.""The main feature I have found to be product replication."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pros »

Cons
"They should improve the user interface. It's a little bit complex. It does not have a self-learning method. You need to know how to use it before you touch the system. The user interface is not self-explanatory.""What is lacking in this solution is a simple process to migrate from existing systems.""In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country."

More Hitachi Content Platform Cons »

"It would be nice if you could store file-based in the same box with the same technology.""The feature that we're waiting on is better integration with the cell services.""Compared to, for example, Hitachi NAS, the solution is not mature at all. It's just in its infancy as far as technology goes.""It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product.""The solution is expensive.""There could be improvements in public cloud integration.""I would like to see the licensing fees improved as well as the price per terabytes."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing fees are paid yearly.""The price of this solution could be made more affordable.""In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little.""The price is a little high."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The main feature I have found to be product replication.
Top Answer: The price of this solution could be made more affordable.
Top Answer: There could be improvements in public cloud integration. In the future, one innovation could be for them to make an embedded backup system.
Ranking
6th
Views
1,533
Comparisons
979
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
576
Rating
9.0
3rd
Views
5,968
Comparisons
3,826
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
414
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
Learn More
Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Offer
Learn more about Hitachi Content Platform
Learn more about Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sample Customers
Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
University14%
Pharma/Biotech Company7%
Marketing Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi Content Platform is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 3 reviews while Pure Storage FlashBlade is ranked 3rd in File and Object Storage with 7 reviews. Hitachi Content Platform is rated 9.0, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Content Platform writes "Has valuable retention logs and the DNS is managed by itself ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashBlade writes "Stable with good technical support and easy to manage". Hitachi Content Platform is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID and IBM Cloud Object Storage, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, HPE Primera, Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO and Qumulo. See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.