We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Hitachi Content Platform vs. Qumulo

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Qumulo Logo
5,180 views|4,140 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users.""The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users.""Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data."

More Hitachi Content Platform Pros »

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system.""The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

More Qumulo Pros »

Cons
"They should improve the user interface. It's a little bit complex. It does not have a self-learning method. You need to know how to use it before you touch the system. The user interface is not self-explanatory.""In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country.""What is lacking in this solution is a simple process to migrate from existing systems."

More Hitachi Content Platform Cons »

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates.""The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

More Qumulo Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is real-time analytics.
Top Answer: This product is not available in the Azure marketplace, which is not a good thing. The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive.
Top Answer: We are a reseller and Qumulo is one of the storage solutions that we are dealing with. It is used for software-defined file storage. I am currently researching more use cases so that we can better… more »
Ranking
7th
Views
1,545
Comparisons
981
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
576
Rating
9.0
17th
Views
5,180
Comparisons
4,140
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
367
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
Learn More
Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

Qumulo is the breakthrough leader in simplifying unstructured data management at massive scale across hybrid-cloud environments. Qumulo provides a high-performance file data platform designed to store, manage and create workflows and applications with data in its native file form at a massive scale across hybrid cloud environments. With Qumulo you can easily manage the full data lifecycle from ingestion, transformation, publishing and archiving with cost-effective capacity, dynamic scalability, automatic encryption, real-time analytics and an advanced API that enables customers to easily integrate Qumulo into their technology ecosystem and workflows.

Offer
Learn more about Hitachi Content Platform
Learn more about Qumulo
Sample Customers
Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi Content Platform is ranked 7th in File and Object Storage with 3 reviews while Qumulo is ranked 17th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. Hitachi Content Platform is rated 9.0, while Qumulo is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Content Platform writes "Has valuable retention logs and the DNS is managed by itself ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". Hitachi Content Platform is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID, IBM Cloud Object Storage and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), Scality RING8, NetApp FAS Series, Red Hat Ceph Storage and Pure Storage FlashBlade. See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.