Fivetran vs Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fivetran and Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
  • "I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."
  • "Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."
  • "I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."
  • "In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."
  • "I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."
  • "The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."
  • "The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."
  • More Fivetran Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become some… more »
    Top Answer: I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can… more »
    Top Answer:As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Software… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 31 in Data Replication
    Views
    374
    Comparisons
    237
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    603
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Data Replication
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections. 

    Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

    By transparently and interactively migrating data between heterogeneous storage tiers, HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager software enables IT administrators to match application quality of service requirements to storage system attributes.
    Sample Customers
    DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch
    Cumulus
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company42%
    Outsourcing Company17%
    Transportation Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Replication
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fivetran is ranked 3rd in Data Replication with 19 reviews while Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Replication. Fivetran is rated 8.0, while Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fivetran writes "Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] writes "Enables you to efficiently relocate data. Should focus more on small-midrange markets". Fivetran is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Azure Data Factory, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

    We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.