Compare Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
153
Comparisons
125
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
64
Comparisons
40
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager secures access to elevated privileges. It eliminates shared and static passwords to privileged accounts. It enforces strong authentication and reliable authorization prior to granting access. User access is logged, creating strong accountability.

Privileged Access Manager secures access at scale, supporting over a million password changes daily and access by thousands of authorized users. It is designed for reliability, to ensure continuous access to shared accounts and security groups, even in the event of a site-wide disaster.

Privileged Access Manager grants access to authorized users, applications and services. It can integrate with every client, server, hypervisor, guest OS, database and application, on-premise or in the cloud.

Privileged access management allows granular access control over privileged admin tasks in Office 365. It can help protect your organization from breaches that use existing privileged admin accounts with standing access to sensitive data or access to critical configuration settings. Privileged access management requires users to request just-in-time access to complete elevated and privileged tasks through a highly scoped and time-bounded approval workflow. This configuration gives users just-enough-access to perform the task at hand, without risking exposure of sensitive data or critical configuration settings. Enabling privileged access management in Microsoft 365 allows your organization to operate with zero standing privileges and provide a layer of defense against standing administrative access vulnerabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager
Learn more about Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM) is ranked 23rd in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM) is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Thycotic Secret Server, whereas Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM) is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.