Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] vs Intellect BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] and Intellect BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Process Automation
34th
out of 64 in Process Automation
Views
101
Comparisons
81
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hitachi JP1/Automatic Job Management System, JPI, AJS3
Learn More
Overview

JP1/Automatic Job Management System 3 allows you to automate and optimize various business operations to achieve a system that is highly consistent and reliable. It allows you to automate, on a predefined schedule, day-to-day tasks such as calculating payroll and aggregating sales data. You can even automate one-time tasks and tasks where the task results determine which task is executed next. You can ensure that tasks are executed properly by defining jobs via intuitive operations, executing tasks according to a detailed job schedule, and monitoring tasks to quickly understand the status of execution.

Intellect is a leading provider of Cloud BPM software built for a mobile world, with an award winning rules-based workflow capability. Intellect is focused on delivering the fastest ROI in the industry, and delivers exceptional results for mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises seeking fast time-to-value. The Intellect 8 BPM Platform empowers users to create and manage enterprise apps that include advanced workflow, smart forms, custom reports, and integration capabilities. Click here to learn more: http://hubs.ly/H01Q1R90

Sample Customers
Nikon (Thailand), China Netcom (Group) Company Limited Jilin Branch, Noritz (China) Investment Co., Canon Zhuhai, Omron (Shanghai) Co., Shanghai Daikin Air Conditioning Co., Meitetsucom
300+ customers including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, American Specialty Health, Baker Corp, Bayview Loan Servicing, Circle K, CoreMedica Laboratories, Dunn-Edwards Paints, DynaCare, Edwards Technologies, Emerson Climate Technologies, Enviva, Georgetown University, HGL, Host Hotels & Resorts, Hubbell, Humboldt County, Jacobs, Northgate Markets, Parkways Schools, Princess Cruises, Silliker, Stryker, ThermoFisher Scientific, Wind River, a division of Intel.
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise20%
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while Intellect BPM is ranked 34th in Process Automation. Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Intellect BPM is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intellect BPM writes "It allows for business process data to be captured in a way that's usable and structured for not just business process automation, but business process improvement and optimization". Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Intellect BPM is most compared with .

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.