Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] and ServiceNow Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."
  • "This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."
  • "ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."
  • "The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."
  • "It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."
  • "The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."
  • "It is not very expensive."
  • More ServiceNow Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in… more »
    Top Answer:The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to… more »
    Top Answer:ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    13th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    2,743
    Comparisons
    1,749
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hitachi JP1/Automatic Job Management System, JPI, AJS3
    Learn More
    Overview

    JP1/Automatic Job Management System 3 allows you to automate and optimize various business operations to achieve a system that is highly consistent and reliable. It allows you to automate, on a predefined schedule, day-to-day tasks such as calculating payroll and aggregating sales data. You can even automate one-time tasks and tasks where the task results determine which task is executed next. You can ensure that tasks are executed properly by defining jobs via intuitive operations, executing tasks according to a detailed job schedule, and monitoring tasks to quickly understand the status of execution.

    ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

    Sample Customers
    Nikon (Thailand), China Netcom (Group) Company Limited Jilin Branch, Noritz (China) Investment Co., Canon Zhuhai, Omron (Shanghai) Co., Shanghai Daikin Air Conditioning Co., Meitetsucom
    experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while ServiceNow Orchestration is ranked 13th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is rated 0.0, while ServiceNow Orchestration is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Orchestration writes "Fastest upgrading technology in the market currently". Hitachi JP1 Automatic Job Management System [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow Orchestration is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Control-M, Nintex Process Platform and BMC TrueSight Orchestration.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.