• Home
  • Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] vs. OpenText MBPM

Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL]?
Jaideep MS
A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

    • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    41st
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    443
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hitachi JP1/Automatic Operation, JP1, AO
    Metastorm BPM
    Learn More
    Hitachi Vantara
    OpenText
    Overview

    JP1/Automatic Operation automates the day-to-day IT operations that are performed in a system. This product allows you to automate a series of operations (including those that require operator input) that might have been quite difficult to automate via other means. JP1/Automatic Operation covers both routine operations (such as checking the operating statuses of servers, and starting, stopping, and restarting servers) and irregular or on-demand work (such as adding and deleting virtual machines), as well as temporary measures for handling system failures. JP1 helps you work more efficiently by automating various IT operations, ranging from day-to-day and routine operations to those that are highly complex.

      OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
      Sample Customers
      Information Not Available
      Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm17%
      Government16%
      Computer Software Company14%
      Insurance Company10%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business14%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise69%
      Buyer's Guide
      Process Automation
      April 2024
      Download Free Report
      Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
      DOWNLOAD NOW
      768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Hitachi JP1 Automatic Operation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.

      We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.