• Home
  • Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool

Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] vs IBM Tivoli NetCool comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] and IBM Tivoli NetCool based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL]?
OmBachu
Good instrumentation and data gathering
Tivoli NetCool allows us to grasp a lot of data that can be applied toward predictive analytics and auto-remediation.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Customers are required to pay a licensing fee."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "It costs around 100k for every ten servers, which is lower than similar products from other vendors."
  • "The price of the product is too expensive."

    • More IBM Tivoli NetCool Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
    Top Answer:I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the… more »
    Read all 18 answers   →
    What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool?
    Top Answer:The tool had many built-in automation capabilities.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool?
    Top Answer:There are problems with the latest security requirements because many things have changed in recent years, and now the security audits are very strict. And we need to switch to something else. We need… more »
    Read all 9 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Network Management Applications
    8th
    out of 31 in Network Management Applications
    Views
    892
    Comparisons
    287
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    443
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hitachi JP1/Network Node Manager i, JP1, NNMi. SNMP System Observer
    Tivoli NetCool
    Learn More
    Hitachi Vantara
    IBM
    Overview

    JP1/Network Node Manager i uses industry-standard SNMP to manage your entire network from a central graphical map. JP1/Network Node Manager i detects nodes in the network and then automatically creates an up-to-date network configuration map (topology map). Each icon used to represent a managed node changes color according to the target's status, making it easy to identify problems. When a failure occurs that results in a large number of problems, the RCA function can be used to identify the most important events that need to be addressed, so that administrators can be notified accordingly. In addition, by linking this product with JP1/SNMP System Observer (which monitors system resources and processes), you can monitor the network configuration and perform alive monitoring of system resources and application processes from the same window.

    IBM Tivoli Netcool delivers near real-time, consolidated event management across business infrastructure, data centers, complex networks and IT domains. The software provides full management and automation to help you deliver continuous uptime of business services and applications.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Management Applications
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while IBM Tivoli NetCool is ranked 8th in Network Management Applications with 12 reviews. Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Tivoli NetCool is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli NetCool writes "Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed". Hitachi JP1 Network Node Manager i [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Tivoli NetCool is most compared with SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, OpenText Network Node Manager i, HPE Intelligent Management Center, Moogsoft and Cisco DNA Center.

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.