Hitachi Mercury [EOL] vs IBM Scale-out File System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi Mercury [EOL] and IBM Scale-out File System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
24th
out of 27 in NAS
Views
49
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
NAS
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Mercury, BlueArc
Scale-out File System
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview
Mercury Technology has established comprehensive Managed Service plans for the Oracle software suite.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Moravian Land Archive, Nacamar, Neopost (France), Nielsen//NetRatings, Pacific Capital Bancorp, Raiffeisen Bank, Sema, Victoria and Albert Museum, Wasu Digital TV Media Group
AppAdvice, King's College London
Buyer's Guide
NAS
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while IBM Scale-out File System is ranked 24th in NAS. Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Scale-out File System is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Scale-out File System is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.