We performed a comparison between Hitachi Mercury [EOL] and IBM FlashSystem based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.Earn 20 points
Hitachi Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while IBM FlashSystem is ranked 4th in NAS with 106 reviews. Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM FlashSystem is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FlashSystem writes "An easy GUI and simple provisioning but our model does not support compression". Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM FlashSystem is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Pure Storage FlashArray, NetApp AFF, Dell Unity XT and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.
See our list of best NAS vendors.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.