Buurst SoftNAS vs Hitachi Mercury [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Buurst SoftNAS and Hitachi Mercury [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 27 in NAS
Views
217
Comparisons
164
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In NAS
Buyer's Guide
NAS
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SoftNAS Cloud Enterprise
Mercury, BlueArc
Learn More
Overview

SoftNAS Cloud NAS is a software-defined, full-featured enterprise cloud NAS filer for primary data storage that enables existing applications securely migrate to the cloud without re-engineering. With enterprise-class NAS features like: high-availability, deduplication, compression, thin-provisioning, snapshots, replication, cloning, encryption (at rest and in transit), LDAP and Active Directory integration, and support for NFS, CIFS, iSCSI or AFP storage protocols, SoftNAS Cloud NAS protects mission-critical and primary, active/hot data.

Mercury Technology has established comprehensive Managed Service plans for the Oracle software suite.
Sample Customers
Netflix, Boeing, Nike, Coca Cola, Hearst, Ndemand, Carbon Media Group, Atypon, The Street, MagHub, CenturyLink, InfoSys
Moravian Land Archive, Nacamar, Neopost (France), Nielsen//NetRatings, Pacific Capital Bancorp, Raiffeisen Bank, Sema, Victoria and Albert Museum, Wasu Digital TV Media Group
Buyer's Guide
NAS
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Buurst SoftNAS is ranked 18th in NAS while Hitachi Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. Buurst SoftNAS is rated 0.0, while Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Buurst SoftNAS is most compared with FreeNAS and NetApp FAS Series, whereas Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.