We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."
Sonexion system’s modular, pre-integrated and compact design keeps costs low while delivering the right performance for analytics, compute clusters and supercomputers of all types. Performance and capacity scale efficiently in modular building blocks, reducing the number of hard disk drives needed to achieve sustained performance at scale. Performance is optimized end to end, from the compute clients to the network to the storage subsystem, based on the application workload.
Data protection is provided through Grid RAID, a declustered parity form of data protection that speeds up rebuild times three and a half times over traditional RAID, while maintaining Lustre performance.
Hitachi NAS is ranked 11th in NAS with 3 reviews while Sonexion Scale-out Lustre Storage System is ranked 16th in NAS. Hitachi NAS is rated 7.6, while Sonexion Scale-out Lustre Storage System is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi NAS writes "Good performance and reliability, but the management interface needs to be improved". On the other hand, Hitachi NAS is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform N Series, IBM FlashSystem and IBM Scale-out NAS, whereas Sonexion Scale-out Lustre Storage System is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), FreeNAS, Panasas ActiveStor, NetApp FAS Series and IBM FlashSystem.
See our list of best NAS vendors.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.