Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."
  • "We purchased the product directly from NetApp."
  • "The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."
  • "The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."
  • "Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."
  • "They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage..."
  • "The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."
  • "In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."
  • More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.
    Top Answer:For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time.
    Top Answer:There's not much scope for improvement. I think the solution is more restricted with the underlying cloud. The performance of the single instances depends on the performance of the underlying cloud… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Storage Management
    Views
    835
    Comparisons
    502
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    659
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Storage Command Portal
    ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Hitachi Storage Command Portal (HSCP) centralizes storage management reporting across the Hitachi Storage Command management suite by providing custom business views of applications and reports on Hitachi storage usage by those applications. HSCP provides a way to easily align Hitachi storage assets with the applications and business functions that use them.

    NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

    Sample Customers
    UHC (University HealthSystem Consortium)
    1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company20%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization45%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise51%
    Large Enterprise40%
    Buyer's Guide
    Storage Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked 1st in Cloud Software Defined Storage with 60 reviews. Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Its data tiering helps keep storage costs under control". Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Azure NetApp Files, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Cloud Storage and Portworx Enterprise.

    We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.