We performed a comparison between Hitachi Thin Image Advanced and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."Hitachi Thin Image is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is the replication. We normally set it up to avoid any kind of data loss."
"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."
"SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is a continuous process. However, during upgrades, there may be differences between the primary and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server, requiring us to stop the replication. The Replication Server must have support for the database version, regardless of where it is being replicated from. Even if the database versions do not match, replication should still occur."
Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is ranked 5th in Data Replication with 1 review while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is ranked 14th in Data Replication with 1 review. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is rated 8.0, while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced writes "Direct contact with technical support was good, stability is evident, with defined scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server writes "Useful data loss prevention, but upgrading requires replication halting ". Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is most compared with NetApp Snapshot and Hitachi ShadowImage, whereas SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.