Compare Hitachi Universal Replicator vs. IBM Softek TDMF
Views
108
Comparisons
89
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
250
Comparisons
169
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 67% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Softek TDMF
Hitachi Universal Replicator satisfies the most demanding business continuity and disaster recovery requirements. This software asynchronously replicates data between Hitachi storage systems, over any distance.
IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.
Learn more about Hitachi Universal Replicator
Learn more about IBM Softek TDMF
Shandong Telecom
BT
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hitachi Universal Replicator is ranked 13th in Data Replication while IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 11th in Data Replication. Hitachi Universal Replicator is rated 0.0, while IBM Softek TDMF is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi Universal Replicator is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication, whereas IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.