Compare Hitachi Universal Replicator vs. Lumen SafeHaven
Views
93
Comparisons
77
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
94
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 66% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
SafeHaven, SafeHaven DRaaS, CenturyLink SafeHaven
Hitachi Universal Replicator satisfies the most demanding business continuity and disaster recovery requirements. This software asynchronously replicates data between Hitachi storage systems, over any distance.
CenturyLink SafeHaven DRaaS offers an efficient way to protect your enterprise data and production systems - easily and affordably.
Learn more about Hitachi Universal Replicator
Learn more about Lumen SafeHaven
Shandong Telecom
Seattle Seahawks, tipico, serco
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hitachi Universal Replicator is ranked 13th in Data Replication while Lumen SafeHaven is ranked 10th in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Hitachi Universal Replicator is rated 0.0, while Lumen SafeHaven is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi Universal Replicator is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication, whereas Lumen SafeHaven is most compared with Azure Site Recovery.
See our list of .
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.