We performed a comparison between Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] and NetApp NVMe AFF A800 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."It's very fast and very easy to use. It performs well and is both flexible and compatible. We like it because it's easy to use."
"Technical support has been amazing."
"The support team is available all the time and they seem to know what they are doing."
"We can store more for a cheaper price as opposed to paying for larger devices and larger rack spaces which get outdated sooner and which we'd have to change every two years. It simplifies storage for us."
"The most valuable feature is that maintenance is free."
"We consume less physical storage because of the solution’s deduplication and compression."
"The most valuable feature is test performance. It helps us store large amounts of data along with providing us faster retrieval of data."
"It is pretty much just plug and play. There is not that much to do with it. It is very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are simplified provisioning and management, de-duplication, and built-in encryption."
"Low latency is the most valuable feature."
"You can easily scale up, and scale-out."
"Over the eight years, we've been using NetApp with ONTAP, we've never lost a bit of data, and we've only experienced a few minutes of downtime in that entire time."
"NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is easier to use than some other solutions and the UI is very good to use for day-to-day activities. Overall, the solution has good technology."
"The storage features are valuable."
"During the use cases of the solution, its reliability and suitability are the best."
"We find the product to be very flexible."
"The product can be scaled vertically as well as horizontally."
"Just some nit picky stuff, like allowing servers and volumes to be grouped. Therefore, it would easier to work with them in the GUI."
"The price should be lower."
"We would like to see more cloud support, which we know is coming, although it's not out yet. It's going to be released in the next versions. That would be the biggest win, if additional cloud support is built into the array."
"In the next release I would like to see integration into other third-party player providers like Google."
"The product should improve its response time. I have also encountered issues with its configuration."
"I would like to get a weekly report of how our storage has been used, and if there is any storage sitting there not being used."
"We would like to integrate it more with our backup solutions."
"I would rate this solution an eight. To make it a ten it would have to be a little cheaper."
"The exterior display needs to be improved."
"Sometimes, it takes a while to get somebody competent on the other end of the line. They do have engineers in multiple time zones around the world. However, their level-one support is not always the best."
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It would be ideal if they could adjust it so that it's a but less."
"The initial setup should be easier, and more like a plug-and-play approach."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The product’s UI could be better."
"The product's performance has some shortcomings, making it an area that could be a little better."
"Stability is an area with a certain shortcoming where the solution needs to improve"
"The initial setup is complex."
More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in All-Flash Storage while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is ranked 17th in All-Flash Storage with 10 reviews. Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is rated 10.0, while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] writes "Good price-performance ratio, provides simplified provisioning and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 writes "Very easy to manage, highly stable and offers robustness of the CLI, API, and GUI ". Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series, Huawei OceanStor Dorado, Dell PowerMax NVMe and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.