We performed a comparison between Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform and Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."I like its speed. It has all the features that I need."
"Provides fast access and is user-friendly."
"This solution has improved our organization in the way that we used to see latency but now with this solution we don't. It also has good performance. Latencies have come down for our performance in the SQL databases. We can put a lot more in a lot less in terms of space savings. We also save data center space have good deduplication."
"The amount of throughput that we're getting is really nice."
"The most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray are the management view of the solutions, ease of provision, and deprovision, it is fantastic."
"One of the features that my customers are really interested in is immutable snapshots. There are immutable snapshots to which your applications can be reverted back if you are hit by some kind of ransomware threat or malicious attack. That's kind of a key deal, and it is one of the selling points I use to point out to my customers the value and the features that Pure Storage brings to the table."
"Data reduction and compression. Sub millisecond latency."
"The code upgrades are very smooth."
"The setup is very easy to manage and configure. The initial setup and takes one hour more or less."
"The product has great data storage performance with a 100% data security and availability guarantee."
"It's best features are its reliability and stability."
"The high performance of flash storage is especially valuable to us."
"There are no significant challenges in terms of scalability, and it can accommodate larger storage capacities compared to other storage solutions."
"This is one of the most stable, high-end solutions in this area."
"The product provides a good storage space."
"The product offers high stability."
"It's actually shaking hands with the workflow solutions much better than any other storage."
"There was some complexity in the initial setup."
"When we were doing some tests, we found that there was an I/O freeze when they were switching the controller."
"Its price needs improvement. Its price is almost double than any other flash storage solution."
"The higher education moves slowly. We are still looking forward to implementing the full list of existing features."
"Part of our company works on Dell EMC because Pure Storage did not have synchronous applications when we were purchasing our products."
"In the configuration, which we brought in or tested it in, it has a very limited config as far as the array goes. That said, it still did more than our anticipation."
"One thing I'd like to see in a future release is integration between their main storage array and what they call their FlashBlade product; to be able to snapshot directly from the primary array into multiple different backup copies on FlashBlade."
"A three wave application or multi wave application synchronization would be an improvement."
"The initial setup was difficult, as we don't have access to assistance. We had some issues around configuration. We needed to know things like what kind of rate is the best, or what kind of replication is ideal. We had to seek out answers online to get the information we needed."
"The snapshot and clone operation functions can be made easier."
"One improvement I am hoping for in the next release is unified storage."
"The complex setup phase is an area where improvements are needed."
"The solution is priced higher than its competitors."
"If they had a certain approach to layered storage, it would be better. For example, adaption to the browser, or having a centralized console."
"Hitachi should offer a distinct overview of the various storage choices."
"The distributor needs more knowledgeable resources for technical support. It would be better to connect directly to the vendor in case of queries."
"It has to be flexible according to the customer's requirements. It has to be aligned with the customer business and the business environment."
More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is ranked 10th in All-Flash Storage with 48 reviews while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked 34th in All-Flash Storage. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is rated 8.4, while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform writes "It's a high-performing solution with strong architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System writes "Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions". Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is most compared with IBM FlashSystem, Dell PowerStore, NetApp AFF, Dell Unity XT and Huawei OceanStor Dorado, whereas Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is most compared with Dell Unity XT.
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.