Most Helpful Review
The footproot of the arrays is significantly smaller while the application response time has approved
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Things that have been really useful, of course, are the clustering features and being able to stay online during failovers and code upgrades; and just being able to seamlessly do all sorts of movement of data without having to disrupt end-users' ability to get to those files. And we can take advantage of new shelves, new hardware, upgrade in place. It's kind of magic when it comes to doing those sorts of things.
The ease of use, the SnapMirror capabilities, the cloning, and the efficiencies are all good features.
We are using the AQoS operating system, which allows us to get a lot more out of our AFF systems.
The most valuable features are the ease of administration and configuration, as well as the speed of deployment.
The most important features are the IOPS and the ease of the ONTAP manageability.
Before we implemented AFF, Oracle was running on a traditional storage spindle and at a very low speed with high latency, and the database was not running very well. After we converted from the spinning disk to the all-flash array, it was at least four times faster to access the volume than before.
The most valuable features of the solution are speed, performance, and reliability.
The most valuable feature is speed.
This is one of the most stable, high-end solutions in this area.
The most valuable feature is that you can use it with all deployment models.
It is the most stable high-end solution in this area.
The high performance of flash storage is especially valuable to us.
This is one of the most reliable and dependable products on the market.
I am happy about the storage system and availability.
It's a state of the art solution in storage systems. High-availability and performance are the strongest aspects of these machines.
It uses the same platform for connectivity so integration is seamless.
The most valuable feature of this solution is performance.
Using this solution has made our backups more reliable.
The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on.
The initial setup is pretty easy and simple.
We have integrated it with VMware. The integration process is pretty good. Especially with VMware, it helps with the capacity of it.
We can capacity plan at a greater level than we used to.
It has absolutely simplified our storage because the dashboards on the consoles show a clear understanding of where you are, and it is also very easy to provision. This been a big help for our teams.
One of the areas that the product can improve is definitely in the user interface. We don't use it for SAN, but we've looked at using it for SAN and the SAN workflows are really problematic for my admins, and they just don't like doing SAN provisioning on that app. That really needs to change if we're going to adopt it and actually consider it to be a strong competitor versus some of the other options out there.
There are little things that need improvement. For example, if you are setting up a SnapMirror through the GUI, you are forced to change the destination name of the volume, and we like to keep the volume names the same.
The quality of technical support has dwindled over time and needs to be improved.
On the fiber channel side, there is a limit of sixteen terabytes on each line, and we would like to see this raised because we are having to use some other products.
The certification classes are good, but they don't cover enough of the material, and the exams only test on what is covered in class.
The monitor and performance need improvement. Right now we are using the active IQ OnCommand Unified Manager, but we also have to do the Grafana to do the performance and I hope we will be able to see the improvement of the active IQ in terms of the performance graph. It should also be more detailed.
Tech support is a place where there is room to improve the product experience. The response time when they are busy is not very good.
The price of NVMe storage is very expensive.
The interface should be simplified and made easier to use.
The user interface should be made simpler because it is difficult to manage.
The installation procedure it a bit difficult, because it is a high-end solution. With this type of product, the original company is interested in doing the setup for customers in the area, but because of sanctions we were not able to get support in our area. We faced many issued trying to learn to run this product.
In terms of new features, I would be interested to see deduplication added in their next release.
In the next version I would like to see additional features like artificial intelligence and an increase in the amount of data it can store.
In the next version I would like to see more intelligence.
The user experience is pretty bad in Hitachi. A lot of mandatory tasks take a long time to work through.
It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product.
I would like to see more VM-Aware features in the next release of this solution.
I would like to see more monitoring capability included in the next release of this solution.
In terms of scalability, it doesn't expand out quite as robustly as some of the others, but it covers 90% of the market in what it does.
The speed could be improved.
I have not seen ROI.
The technical support needs to improve. When we open a case, it is auto assigned to a support tech person. Nine out of ten times, we get an email right back saying that person is off until tomorrow. I cannot handle that. They just did this over the weekend to us, too. I had to call our rep and have them do something about it.
On our dedupe during our initial buy, we were expecting a number a little higher like 4x. However, we are getting about 3.6. While it is close enough, it doesn't quite hit the numbers. So, this has been a challenge.
Pricing and Cost Advice
It's expensive. it's in the hundreds of thousands. It's beneficial, but at times, I feel compared to other vendors, we are paying a premium for the licensing that other vendors include.
The price to performance ratio with NetApp is unmatched by any other vendor right now.
The pricing is not a lot considering what you get and it bundles hardware and licensing.
Comparing this solution to others it may seem expensive, but the price to performance for NetApp is greater.
We would like it to be free.
One of the reasons we like this solution is that all of the features are included with the one license.
We don't like the cost. We would like to buy more.
It definitely reduces costs because it simply takes less power to run these systems. While the SSDs don't take power, they are in general very big right now. So, the running cost has decreased for a lot of our customers.
When you are looking for high-end solutions such as this, price is less important than stability and availability.
This is an expensive solution.
This solution is cheaper than Dell EMC VMAX. When you are looking for a high-end solution, price matters, but availability and stability are more important than the price.
Pricing could be better, because the cost is very high.
I would like to see better pricing and more discounts.
Support is a separate line item. Support is a different cost, but whatever your support is now, that's what you're going to pay forever. If your support's $100 today, six years from now it's $100. It doesn't fluctuate unless you upgrade it, or change it, etc.
Our licensing is renewed annually.
I have seen ROI. It has allowed me to increase the density of my VMs without having to purchase anything additional.
We used a reseller for the purchase.
Our customers have seen a reduction in TCO.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
NetApp AFF8000 All Flash FAS systems combine all-flash performance with unified data management from flash to disk to cloud. Leverage the Data Fabric to move data securely across your choice of clouds—enabled by Cloud ONTAP™ and NetApp Private Storage for Cloud. Plus, you get the industry’s most efficient and comprehensive integrated data protection suite, on premises or in the cloud.
RETHINK YOUR DEFINITION OF SPEED AND PERFORMANCE
With adaptive, guaranteed data reduction and a 100% data-availability guarantee, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F series helps you tackle complicated business challenges. Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) VSP F series delivers up to 4.8M IOPS with sub-millisecond response times.
FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.
Learn more about NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS)
Learn more about Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series
Learn more about Pure Storage FlashBlade
|Acibadem Healthcare Group, AmTrust Financial Services, Citrix Systems, DWD, Mantra Group||Turkcell, Owens Corning, Region Nord, Net Credit Financial Group (NFC Group), Russian Railways||ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL|
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider10%
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm6%
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company36%
Marketing Services Firm10%
Comms Service Provider6%
See our list of best All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.