Planful vs SAS Strategic Performance Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Planful Logo
870 views|496 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo
122 views|81 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planful and SAS Strategic Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Right now, everything is on a three-year term contract, and that is our main cost."
  • More Planful Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    870
    Comparisons
    496
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    81
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Performance Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Host Analytics
    Strategic Performance Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    You need a financial planning solution that meets the structured demands of standardized financial planning and reporting requirements and regulations. Structured Planning with Planful automates labor-intensive planning activities in a complete cloud-based platform – giving your finance team control, consistency, and confidence in corporate financial plans.

    SAS Strategic Performance Management facilitates the creation, communication and execution of strategy - promoting focus, alignment and agility throughout the organization.
    Sample Customers
    Tandem Diabetes Care, Reed Exhibitions, SkyGolf, Zep Inc., Thule, Stylesight, Schumacher Group, Parsons Electric, Nextag, Groupon
    Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise47%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Performance Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Planful is ranked 16th in Business Performance Management while SAS Strategic Performance Management is ranked 27th in Business Performance Management. Planful is rated 8.0, while SAS Strategic Performance Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Planful writes "It has helped us speed up the turnaround time on our consolidation, and we haven't had anything come up that the program has not been able to solve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Strategic Performance Management writes "The dashboards provide a good amount of information, but the unique keys in the underlying MySQL database caused some issues". Planful is most compared with Anaplan, Adaptive Insights, Vena, Board and Prophix, whereas SAS Strategic Performance Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.