• Home
  • OpenText TeamSite vs. OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL]

OpenText TeamSite vs OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText TeamSite and OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Difficult to use but a flexible solution.
* Dynamic Content publishing * Custom Workflow development and publishing lifecycle
Use OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL]?
Ranking
15th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
316
Comparisons
260
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Web Content Management
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Autonomy TeamSite, HP Autonomy TeamSite
Learn More
OpenText
OpenText
Overview
HP Autonomy TeamSite can help you meet a wide range of content management demands content authoring, multichannel delivery, site design and layout, multivariate testing, content targeting, rich media management, advanced analytics, social content management, workflow and approval, and archiving.

OpenText Web Experience Management is an enterprise-grade solution for creating and managing compelling web content across all organizational, end-user-centric touch points - intranet or extranet, public or private. The digital-first enterprise understands the importance of standardizing on a transaction-oriented solution that is robust enough to scale across the organization but is also responsive to the business requirements of most content marketers - especially with the high demands in mobile, social, and video today.

Sample Customers
EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
Barcelona City Council, Hyatt, Junta de Andalucia, People's United Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company26%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider7%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise85%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText TeamSite is ranked 15th in Web Content Management while OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management. OpenText TeamSite is rated 6.0, while OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText TeamSite writes "Difficult to use but a flexible solution". On the other hand, OpenText TeamSite is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, Sitecore Digital Marketing System and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] is most compared with FirstSpirit Enterprise CMS.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.