HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs NetApp FAS Series

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage is ranked 1st in NAS with 146 reviews vs NetApp FAS Series which is ranked 2nd in NAS with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR Flash Storage writes "The flexibility and ability to adjust to business needs is where its robustness is". The top reviewer of NetApp FAS Series writes "The most valuable features are the snapshots, the flash pool that we’re using, and cluster mode. ". HPE 3PAR Flash Storage is most compared with Dell EMC Unity, NetApp All Flash FAS and Nimble Storage. NetApp FAS Series is most compared with IBM Storwize, EMC Isilon and Hitachi NAS. See our HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs NetApp FAS Series report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs NetApp FAS Series and others in NAS.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs NetApp FAS Series

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Scalability, because our customer is fast growing and our solution should be able to start very small and grow very quickly.The chunklet technology is the main benefit out of 3PAR. The way it subdivides. It is using more logic to subdivide the drives into smaller pieces.With our 3PARs, we have never lost data.With the new flash arrays, 3PAR has improved our performance.The new StoreServ Management Console (SSMC) tool is more user-friendly.HPE can login, fix things, alert us to things, and upgrade. We are there and aware, but we do not do the work. So, that is good.3PAR is easy to keep running and does not require too much effort. It has been very reliable, which is key.The scalability is good because it is easy to add in new disks. We just add them on the fly, and they are available for use.

Read more »

One of the most valuable features offered is double-parity RAID, which guarantees that your data will stay intact. We're also able to provision storage and monitor which ones are really consuming storage.It is good to have a unified storage where you can have block and file level protocols.The initial setup was so straightforward. It was well-documented.It is very flexible. It integrates well with the public cloud and other components, so everything can be API driven. Therefore, it is very easy to automate it.Using the built-in Snapshots and SnapMirror technology, we were able to have better working data protection locally and off-site.The storage efficiency provided a maximum savings in our storage utilization.End-users like that they can rely on the Snapshot technology so they can do their restores themselves.Most valuable features are its ease of use, robust Snapshot functionality, and that you can use it in two datacenters with SnapMirror-ing.

Read more »

Cons
Security is a mandatory feature because our customer needs to protect delicate information.I would like to see a faster Ethernet connection. Right now, it is 10G. If they could do multiple hundred gigs to speed up the transfer from the array to the servers, that would be good. We are trying to get away from Fibre Channel.We need additional enhancements to InfoSight, especially from a VM standpoint. Today, we can see in the Azure VM performance stats in 3PAR, but it is so huge, we can't just drill down on each and every VM and look at its performance.We are seeing that there are some enhancements which are required in the SSMC console. There are some features that we do not see in the dashboard.There are some weird things that we can't figure out.I would like to see the ability to be able to migrate to newer versions of the 3PAR without having to take any of our data offline and be able to upgrade on the fly.We would like to see better support for iSCSI.A lot of tasks, you have to manually set up. They need to already have them set up and working. Then, you can just go in and tweak them if you need to.

Read more »

I would like to see less latency and higher IOPS.It lacks automatic tiering, When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives.The only downside is in ease in management; it is not easy to use.It's not a cheap system. It is very expensive. The pricing has been ridiculous every time that we had to renew the support.We would like to have further integration with some backup products. They have some of them already, but there could be more.The AutoSupport could be improved to be more proactive in certain cases.When getting new hardware, always tell the account manager that you are also considering other brands. They will be forced to adjust the price lower.Needs to ​add wizards for newer, inexperienced users.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Making the decisions to buy it can be complex.Since the prices of the flash storage has gone down tremendously, I would definitely recommend going for the all-flash storage array or 3PAR. It is a big expensive even now, but it will be the future of all industries.You can't get software maintenance from a third party. You have to do it from HPE, which is a letdown.3PAR was quite a bit less money than EMC, and that was one of the deciding factors.We had to go back and purchase iLO licenses and brocade switches for the flex fabric to have a complete solution.Cost-wise, it is a little bit on the higher side, but it is an awesome product.We are going to buy eight nodes this year and eight nodes next year. Eventually, we are not going to want to buy large storage devices and probably utilize just storage, but in a different manner going forward.It is a little more money, but it is worth it because it does it better.

Read more »

The scalability is pretty good, but it's too expensive.The price, compared to competitors, is quite high.Cost effective storage for all performance levels (including all-flash).The only area that could be improved is to lower prices for their All Flash FAS.The price it not low, but comparing features to other vendors, the price can be balanced.There are products available in market with comparatively lower costs.Most storage vendors also have software, or licensing bundles, which may offer the required licenses considerably cheaper, but do also maybe offer licenses, which are not needed.The process for going to cluster mode is expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
66,841
Comparisons
32,586
Reviews
148
Followers
2,448
Avg. Rating
8.4
Views
16,070
Comparisons
8,957
Reviews
22
Followers
778
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more HPE 3PAR Flash Storage competitors »
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
See more NetApp FAS Series competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsInServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
Website/Video
Website/VideoHewlett Packard Enterprise
NetApp
Overview
Overview

HP 3PAR all-flash storage accelerates business agility by boosting application performance with over 900,000 IOPS at less than 0.7 ms latency. And it does this while delivering all the enterprise-class, Tier-1 features and functionality you expect from the storage platform that powers three of the world’s four largest managed service providers.

NetApp FAS Series offers powerful, affordable, flexible data storage for midsized businesses and distributed enterprises. NetApp FAS Series, named a 'Champion' and 'Best in Overall Value' by Info-Tech Research Group, is affordable, and is a more powerful storage platform than other systems in its class.
OFFER
Free Quote

We will send you a quote of 3PAR typically within 24 hours.

Learn more about NetApp FAS Series
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersJust Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MCChildren's Hospital Central California, Plex Systems, PDF PNI Digital Media, Denver Broncos, PDF KSM Legal, Clayton Companies, Virginia Community College
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
22%
Healthcare Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
16%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
University
7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
26%
Healthcare Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
University
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
14%
Healthcare Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
8%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
26%
Large Enterprise
59%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
69%
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs NetApp FAS Series and others in NAS.
Download now
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email