HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs Pure Storage

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage is ranked 1st in All-Flash Arrays with 105 reviews vs Pure Storage which is ranked 7th in All-Flash Arrays with 8 reviews. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR Flash Storage writes "The ease of moving data around is beneficial". The top reviewer of Pure Storage writes "The price was slightly higher than others but competitive if you consider all the other features that you get from it". HPE 3PAR Flash Storage is most often compared with EMC VNX, NetApp All Flash FAS and Pure Storage vs Pure Storage which is most often compared with Dell EMC XtremIO Flash Storage, NetApp All Flash FAS and HPE 3PAR Flash Storage.
19060
29071
Most Helpful Review
Hpe 3par flash storage vs. pure storage report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs. Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Arrays
246,941 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members Comparing HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs Pure Storage
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The reliability. We're able to replicate our array to our DR site with minimal work. It's just turn it on and we're ready to go. It reduces risk for the businessThanks to HPE remote IT assistance, they can do the updates with the configuration in best-case scenarioPreviously, we were using EVA from HPE. When we moved to 3PAR, we noticed a reduction in footprint, reduced by more than 30%. We use the Adaptive Optimization, giving us a reduction in cost and with better performanceFrom my perspective, it's really easy for me to be able to get in and do any troubleshooting with it and it's very consistentWe use a virtual domain in 3PAR and we can create individual pools where clients are able to manage their own resources, instead of we, as storage admin, getting involved in that

Read more »

Non-disruptive upgrades: You can upgrade at anytime without worryIt has made working with storage as easy and simple as it should beVery stable; no worries about how much it can handlePerformance, deduplication, compression, and fast response time for requests from servers and applicationsThe most valuable features are extremely low latency, high IOPS with VMware, inline deduplication and compression

Read more »

Cons
HPE has a product that I am very interested in, but it lacks of integration with 3PAR - HPE SimpliVityWe have had some challenges in the Arabic implementation and in migration, but for daily work, it's fineI would like them to improve it so I can do firmware upgrades without downtimeWe are still waiting for the compression feature to be deployedWould like to see ​some management functions through a web interface.​

Read more »

Just some nit picky stuff, like allowing servers and volumes to be grouped. Therefore, it would easier to work with them in the GUIHad some issues with Purity not being entirely compatible with VMware ESXiI would like some form of QoS implemented. As a service provider, it would be beneficial to have itI’d love to view the average, minimum and maximum performance in the reports (Analysis tab - Performance) but it is only graphics and you need to export data in CSV to find this informationI would like to see more detailed reporting on the data. However, it would be nice to know what are the exact VMs usage after deduplication and/or what that VMs actual latency and bandwidth is, outside of VMware

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
To be more competitive, as customer, we need a more aggressive price that includes all the licenses availableAs a school, we always have​ low budgets. We are a nonprofit organization. We do not have too much budget, so we care about prices, discounts, and especially about the product quality. The last 16 years, we have been an HPE customer. We are very much happy with HPE productsNowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitiveIt's very reliable and it was cost competitive with other arrays at the time that we purchased itThe main issue with 3PAR right now is its cost problem. Right now, there are some other storage cabinets that can do what 3PAR can do. Now, they can do it as well with a more revised budget

Read more »

For pricing, you have to take into account their performance on deduplication and compression in a $/GB comparisonThere is always room for negotiationIt is a more expensive solution, but it is worth it. You are getting what you paid forWe feel that the pricing is fair and the licensing process was easy for bothThe price was slightly higher than others, but competitive, if you consider all the other features that you get from it

Read more »

Hpe 3par flash storage vs. pure storage report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs. Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Arrays
246,941 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
77,542
Comparisons
41,966
Reviews
117
Followers
3,184
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
35,209
Comparisons
22,172
Reviews
5
Followers
2,325
Avg. Rating
9.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Emc logo
Compared 8% of the time.
See more HPE 3PAR Flash Storage competitors »
Netapp social twitter profile 128x128 final reasonably small
Compared 14% of the time.
See more Pure Storage competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsInServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
Website/Video
Website/VideoHewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Vendor 7386 screenshot 1515864945
Pure Storage
  • Vendor 29005 screenshot 1514067353
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

HP 3PAR all-flash storage accelerates business agility by boosting application performance with over 900,000 IOPS at less than 0.7 ms latency. And it does this while delivering all the enterprise-class, Tier-1 features and functionality you expect from the storage platform that powers three of the world’s four largest managed service providers.

Pure Storage is fresh and modern today and will be for the next decade. Without forklift upgrades or planned downtime. Pure Storage takes the work out of storage ownership Ð and delivers unprecedented customer satisfaction.
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersJust Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MCNielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
23%
Retailer
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
16%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
University
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company
15%
Government
15%
Non Profit
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
19%
Healthcare Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
24%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
59%
Hpe 3par flash storage vs. pure storage report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR Flash Storage vs. Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Arrays
Download now
246,941 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all All-Flash Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email